He jumped out, didn’t close the door properly, stormed toward me. I calmly set down my tools, retrieved my phone, started recording video. I stood at the top of the porch steps, six stairs up, giving me elevated position.

Cornelius had to approach uphill, looking up at me. I held the phone at chest height. Lens obviously pointed at him.

Cornelius, you’re on my property uninvited. I’m recording this conversation. I don’t care about your recording.

His face was red, movements aggressive. You set up some legal scheme to steal from your own daughter. The trust protects my assets and ensures Beulah inherits appropriately.

It’s completely legal. Appropriately? What does that mean? Unless she divorces me? That’s what you really want, isn’t it? The trust ensures my property isn’t subject to claims by third parties. That’s standard estate planning.

Third parties? I’m family, your son-in-law. You’re my daughter’s husband. You have no legal claim to my property.

The trust simply formalizes that reality. His voice climbed higher. We’ll see about that.

I’ll get a lawyer. I’ll contest this. I’ll make sure you never see Beulah again.

You’re threatening to isolate my daughter from me because I protected my own property? That’s interesting. For the record, this isn’t over. Then leave my property.

Now, or I’ll call the sheriff for trespassing. He stormed back to his car. The engine roared.

Gravel sprayed as he reversed wily and sped down the driveway. I stopped recording. Reviewed the immediately.

Faces visible. Audio clear. Threats documented.

I uploaded it to cloud storage and emailed a copy to Thornton with subject line. Evidence, hostile confrontation. That evening, I wrote a detailed incident report.

Date, time, what was said. No witnesses, unfortunately, but the video captured everything. Thornton’s response came within an hour.

Continue documenting everything. Consider medical evaluation to preempt competency challenges. Expect retaliation.

They’re running out of options. I called Dr. Patricia Chen’s clinic the next morning. The receptionist asked if something specific prompted the request.

I’m 67, I own property, and I want documentation that I’m healthy and competent. Preventive planning. The appointment was scheduled for the following Monday.

I sat at my table that night, reviewing the confrontation video. Watching Cornelius’ rage play out on the small screen. His mask had dropped completely when the money was threatened.

Every word recorded. Every threat documented. My phone buzzed.

Email from Thornton. Good thinking on medical avowal. They’ll likely try adult protective services next.

Standard playbook for these situations. Stay ahead of them. I type back.

Already scheduled. Appointment next week. Before closing the laptop, I looked at the framed photo of young Beulah on the mantle.

8 years old, missing her front teeth. Laughing at something I’d said. I wondered how much collateral damage this war would create before it ended.

Monday morning found me at Dr. Chen’s clinic, 15 minutes early. The medical building was modern, single story efficient. I filled out paperwork requesting copies of all test results and assessments.

When Dr. Chen called me back, I explained directly. I’m 67, own property and want baseline medical documentation proving my physical and mental competency. She was a sharp woman in her 50s with the weathered competence of someone who’d practiced rural medicine for decades.

Her expression showed understanding. I see. Unfortunately, I’ve encountered situations like this before.

Adult children sometimes challenge parents’ competency to gain control of assets. That’s exactly what I’m preventing. Can you provide a detailed written assessment? Absolutely.

I’ll conduct comprehensive cognitive testing and provide a formal letter. For legal purposes, correct? Correct. I want documentation that can stand up in court if necessary.

Then let’s be thorough. The examination took 90 minutes. Blood pressure, reflexes, blood work.

Then cognitive testing. Mini mental state examination, clock drawing, memory recall exercises. She asked me to draw a clock showing 315.

I drew it precisely. She asked me to remember three words, apple, table, penny, and recall them after five minutes. I remembered all three.

She asked me to count backward from 100 by sevens. I did so accurately. When finished, Dr. Chen typed notes at her computer, then printed a letter on clinic letterhead.

Mr. Ray Nelson is mentally competent, physically healthy, fully capable of managing his own affairs and making independent decisions regarding his property and finances. Patient alert, oriented, cognitively intact. No signs of dementia, confusion, or diminished capacity.

She signed it, applied the clinic stamp, handed me both the letter and copies of all test results. $240 for the extended evaluation. I paid by credit card, noting the transaction carefully for my records.

Two days later, I was in my workshop shed, organizing tools, when an unfamiliar sedan pulled up. A professional looking woman in her 40s emerged, carrying a tablet and official folder. Mr. Nelson, I’m Margaret Willows from Adult Protective Services.

I’m here regarding a complaint filed about your welfare. The flash of anger was immediate, but I kept my expression neutral. A complaint? By whom? I can’t disclose that during my initial assessment.

May I come inside? Of course. Would you like coffee? No, thank you. This is a standard welfare check.

I let her inside, door held open. Transparency. I should tell you up front, I’m involved in a property dispute with family members.

I suspect this complaint is part of that conflict. Not genuine concern about my welfare. I appreciate your honesty.

I’ll conduct my assessment objectively. If the complaint is unfounded, I’ll document that. Margaret walked through the cabin with her tablet, documenting everything.

The kitchen was clean, organized, bills paid and filed systematically. Refrigerator stocked with fresh food. Bathroom tidy.

Bedroom orderly. No safety hazards. No signs of neglect or confusion.

Do you have any difficulty managing daily tasks? Cooking, cleaning, paying bills? No difficulty at all. I’ve lived alone since retiring. I manage everything independently.

The complaint mentions concerns about your mental state. Have you experienced memory problems, confusion, or difficulty making decisions? I retrieved the folder from my desk. I had a comprehensive medical evaluation two days ago specifically to address this concern.

She read Dr. Chen’s assessment carefully. This is very thorough and recent. Most people in your situation don’t have current medical documentation.

I anticipated false allegations. I wanted evidence ready. That’s quite strategic thinking, Mr. Nelson.

Forty years as an engineer, I believe in planning ahead. I also provided recent bank statements showing responsible financial management and copies of my trust documents proving sophisticated estate planning. Margaret took extensive notes.

Her professional demeanor remained neutral, but I recognized the pattern in her questions. She’d seen this before. Family exploitation disguised as concern.

Three days later, Attorney Thornton obtained copies of the official complaint through legal channels. I read it at my kitchen table, slowly, completely, multiple times. Cornelius and Leonard had signed as co-complainants.

The allegations were specific and completely false. Claim, Ray threatened family members with weapons. False, I’ve never owned firearms.

Claim, exhibits paranoid behavior including security cameras everywhere. The cameras exist for legitimate property protection after actual threats. Claim, refuses medical care.

False, I’d just completed comprehensive evaluation. Claim, struggles with basic tasks and makes irrational financial decisions. The trust was sophisticated planning, not irrational.

Grace provided a supporting statement claiming I endangered them with wild animals. The wolf incident from March, now twisted into evidence of incompetence. The complaint requested mandatory psychiatric evaluation and possible conservatorship proceedings.

My jaw tightened as I read. My knuckles went white gripping the pages. They weren’t just attacking my property anymore.

They were attacking my autonomy, my competency, my freedom. This was war. Ten days after Margaret’s visit, official notification arrived.

Adult Protective Services case closed. Complaint determined unfounded. Margaret’s report stated clearly, subject is competent, living independently and safely, no evidence of exploitation, neglect, or diminished capacity.

Recent medical evaluation confirms cognitive and physical health. Complaint appears motivated by family property dispute rather than genuine welfare concerns. No further action warranted.

I created a new folder labeled APS False Complaint, Evidence and filed everything systematically. The original complaint with false allegations, Margaret’s assessment report, case closure letter, my medical evaluation, photographs of my well-maintained cabin, my written rebuttal to each false claim with supporting evidence. The folder joined the growing collection on my shelf.

I was building a comprehensive case file. My phone rang. Thornton.

Ray, I found something. Leonard and Grace have been using your cabin address for something. Public records show mail being sent there in their names.

This could be mail fraud or identity theft. We need to investigate immediately. I looked out the window at the mailbox by the road.

I hadn’t thought to check for mail addressed to people who don’t live here. I’m heading there now. I grabbed my truck keys wondering what else I was about to discover.

I grabbed my keys and drove down the long driveway to the mailbox. Quarter mile of dirt road, dust rising behind the truck in the late afternoon heat. August in Wyoming made the air shimmer above the ground.

The mailbox was standard aluminum on a weathered post surrounded by tall grass. I pulled on gloves before opening it. Didn’t want my fingerprints on mail that wasn’t mine.

Three envelopes, all addressed to Leonard Harrison or Grace Harrison at my cabin address. Wyoming Department of Family Services. First Mountain Credit Union.

Social Security Administration. I photographed each envelope carefully with my phone. Front.

Back. Postmarks visible. Dates clear.

Then I placed them in a plastic evidence bag I’d brought specifically for this purpose and drove back to the cabin. Thornton answered on the first ring. Ray, I found something significant.

Leonard and Grace have been using your address for official correspondence. For what purpose? Benefits fraud, possibly. They’re receiving mail from Wyoming Social Services and they’ve opened a bank account using your cabin address, but your camera footage proves they don’t live there.

That’s a federal crime, isn’t it? Mail fraud, benefits fraud, potentially identity theft if they claim to have your permission. We’re talking years in federal prison if prosecuted. I looked at the evidence bag on my kitchen table.

Then we reported. I’m not covering for criminals just because they’re related to my son-in-law. Understood.

I’ll prepare the evidence package and contact the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Ray, this changes everything. Once federal charges are filed, their credibility is destroyed.

Good. Maybe they’ll finally face consequences for their actions. The next week moved quickly.

I compiled evidence with the same precision I’d brought to 40 years of engineering projects. Security camera footage showing Leonard and Grace’s single brief visit in May, utility bills proving no additional occupants, the mail records, my sworn statement that I never gave permission to use my address. Thornton forwarded everything to Assistant U.S. Attorney James Morrison in the Economic Crimes Division.

Morrison called me three days later. Mr. Nelson, Attorney Thornton provided compelling evidence of benefits fraud using your property address. I never gave permission for them to use my address.

I have camera footage proving they don’t live here. I’ve reviewed the footage. It’s clear they visited once briefly and never returned.

How long has mail been arriving in their names? Based on postmarks, at least six weeks. That establishes pattern. Combined with benefits applications claiming Wyoming residency, we have sufficient evidence for federal investigation.

I’ll be frank, this will likely result in criminal charges. I’m not trying to ruin their lives, but I won’t allow my property to be used for fraud. You’re doing the right thing by reporting this.